![\"Proaktive](\"http:\/\/www.resources-roots.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Heron-Dance-large-e1412588500641.jpg\")
<\/p>\nTokyo, October 6, 2014<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Japanese institutional investors such as pension funds and financial institutions were traditionally seen as „silent shareholders“ or „sleeping shareholders.“ Companies would have cross-holdings of share with other companies with which they did cooperate, but these investors long supported the management of the companies in which they held investments without getting proactively engaged, even when they were underperforming. This situation has started to take another shape drastically.<\/p>\n
Japanese Financial Service Agency (FSA) launched a Japanese version of „Stewardship Code“<\/strong> in February 2014, inviting institutional investors to sign up. Modelled on the British Stewardship Code adopted in 2010, these Principles for Responsible Institutional Investors<\/strong> were set out as a code of behaviour for institutional investors<\/strong> who hold corporate stocks.<\/p>\n In Japan’s stewardship code, „stewardship responsibility“ is defined as the responsibility of institutional investors to enhance the medium- to long-term investment return for their clients and beneficiaries by improving the investee companies‘ corporate value and promoting sustainable growth through constructive engagement or purposeful dialogue based on in-depth \u00a0and trustfuly understanding of the companies and their business environment.<\/p>\n The code encompasses principles considered to be useful for institutional investors who behave as responsible institutional investors in fulfilling their stewardship responsibilities, with due regard to all stakeholders as to clients\/beneficiaries and to investee companies. The code states: „By fulfilling their stewardship responsibilities properly in line with this Code, institutional investors will also be able to contribute to the growth of the economy as a whole.“ The seven principles in the code are ment to\u00a0promote sustainable growth of the invested company and enhance the medium- and long-term investment return of clients and beneficiaries. \u00a0Institutional investors are invited to:<\/p>\n The code is not a law or legally binding regulation.<\/strong>\u00a0Nevertheless, the FSA expects to see progress in its implementation by compiling a list every three months of institutional investors who have announced that they have adopted the code. As of May 2014, three months after it was launched, 127 institutional investors<\/strong> had announced their intention to adopt it.<\/p>\n The Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF)<\/strong>, managing about 130 trillion yen (about U.S.D. 1.29 trillion), is the biggest among them. Also, in the private sector, some major life insurance companies<\/strong> and trust banks<\/strong> have together indicated their acceptance of the code<\/strong>. In the past, many of the institutional investors were subject the investment management companies for voting at the shareholder meetings of their investments and did not disclose their policies on voting. With the code principles, functions of monitoring investments‘ management will be strengthened, thanks to the code inducing institutional investors to create voting policies or make the respect the sustanability standards more rigorous.<\/p>\n Japan has not been known as a leader in socially responsible investment (SRI), in part due to the lack of proactive institutional investors. The ethical values worked within the Japanese traditions‘ frame. With this new code, „proactive shareholders“ get the larger scale of universal ethical values\u00a0in doing business and may\u00a0play a bigger role in supporting money flows that will enhance a sustainable society. \/RLU<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Tokyo, October 6, 2014 From Silence Shareholders \u00a0to Proactive Stakeholders Japanese institutional investors such as pension funds and financial institutions were traditionally seen as „silent shareholders“ or „sleeping shareholders.“ Companies would have cross-holdings of share with other companies with which they did cooperate, but these investors long supported the management of the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1,22],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n